Happy New Year

I was talking with some friends Sunday – the topic of the new year came up with a variety of cares and concerns typical of a new year – it’s common to evaluate the old and new year – these considerations sometimes come with concerns.

A new year can be a little exciting, a little scary, and sometimes a little crazy.

True, it is a new year, but we still have the same ‘hope’ written in scripture so long ago.

Romans 15:4  “For whatever was written in earlier times was written for our instruction, so that through perseverance and the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.”

It’s a fact, considering a new year can come with some struggles – it’s a good time to remember Jesus is sufficient, the gospel is also sufficient, and scripture is our instructions – be encouraged, we can hold on to the hope of Christ.

This verse shares that what was written in earlier times was written for our instruction; so that we might have hope – God’s word, written so long ago, holds hope for each of us who read it today –  it is filled with instruction, but we must persevere through the struggles of life and hold on to the hope written in the pages of God’s word.

So, if we find ourselves struggling or maybe last year wasn’t what we thought it would be, hang on to the hope of Christ written down for our instruction – be encouraged, the gospel is sufficient.

To Learn or not to Learn…

There’s a ton of social and political chatter about what parts of our nation’s history should be kept, removed, focused on, ignored, and why these positions matter.

Personally, I love history (now) – but I haven’t always taken history or its textbooks seriously – for most of my life I just assumed the history I learned was a comprehensive collection of relevant and meaningful topics to provide a holistic perspective of the nation and state’s histories.

Now, I feel history is a critical requirement at national and state levels – we can’t just assume socially, or politically motivated trends should be an uncontested source and voice of what is relevant, meaningful, or important topics for the study of history.

We must see the importance of ensuring we don’t eliminate, candy coat, or make light of relevant, meaningful, or important historical topics – why?

Knowledge of history is sure to bring light to interesting, significant, appropriate, and even ugly historic trends that can easily serve as generational bedrock layers of our critical and collective histories.

Knowledge of history is the best source of what should never be repeated – the absence of history is the absence of critical lesson’s leaned needed to map our paths into the future – altering or tweaking history will always have an underlying motive – knowledge of history will ensure these many motives are transparent and embraced or called out.

Knowledge of history should never be feared or forgotten – every nation, people group, religion, government, war/conflict, social or political trend has critical historical facts which act as our best navigational insight of how to evolve into the future – all nations and peoples make mistakes, errors, or failures – pretending this missteps are not relevant is shortsighted, self-serving, and doomed to generate a negative consequence.

Just about weekly, I come across unique national or state level historical points I had no knowledge of – I’m saddened for the lack of knowledge, but I’m thrilled at the value, and significance gained by leveraging this undisclosed historical knowledge – my perspective is clearer – my personal beliefs or more relevant – my desire for social justice is strengthened – my hope for our nation is boosted – my faith in God and His plan all the peoples of the earth is codified.

This week I learned about George Stinney – recently a court acknowledged the wrongful execution of 14-year-old George Stinney on June 16, 1944 – I challenge you to look into this story – do more than just read the headline – is this just a small irrelevant bump in our collective history? Or is this a critical piece of our ugly history that needs to be learned from – so that we never allow our laws, courts, county/state/national social justice and legal structures to fail it’s citizenship as we evolve forward into our shared history.

14 year old George Stinney – his voice cries out from our collective history for us to do better – to be better – and to learn more from our past.

Remembering Why We Have Independence Day

If there ever was a source document for a holiday, “The Declaration of Independence” is (without a doubt) the source document Independence Day – oddly enough, some of the most critical predispositions of its original purposes are often misquoted, misrepresented, and even ignored even while we continue to celebrate Independence Day.

For clarity and transparency, a copy of the original text of “The Declaration of Independence” has been inserted at the bottom of this article – Note: spelling and punctuation reflects the original document.

How could a document that is so clearly written be so grossly misinterpreted? Let’s consider some of the original conditions and motives the document illustrates.

The Declaration of Independence was intended for many audiences: a king, the colonists, and all the known world – it was meant to rally troops, persuade foreign allies, and to announce the creation of a new country – to explain the colonists’ right to revolution, “to declare the causes which impel them to the separation” –  this new nation needed to prove the legitimacy of its cause, while defying the most powerful nation on earth – it needed to clarify, synchronize and motivate colonists, solicit allies, and justify its intent for independence in one document.

Most of us know familiar the components of the declaration, like the preamble – “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness.”

This attention seeking introduction was designed to convince Americans (then and now) to put our lives on the line for the cause of equality, basic human rights, life, liberty, and happiness – which meant separation from a mother country who threatened our sense of security, economic stability, and identity – the preamble sought to inspire, unite, and illustrate a vision of a better life.

The declaration then rolls right into a series of conditional statements that define the abuses/faults that created situations demanding independence:

-If the king did not derive his just powers from the consent of the governed…

-If the Government becomes destructive…

-If there are repeated abuses and violations, perpetually pursuing the same evidence designed to reduce us to oppression/tyranny…  

-If those condition persisted…

-It is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government.

-It is the right and duty of the people to throw off such a government, and to provide a new one for future security.

-There must be a foundation of principles and organize powers to provide safety and happiness.

Next the document presses it’s point with a written declaration that in spite extreme patience/tolerance of the colonies, the wrongs, abuses, and errors under the King of Great Britain had gone too far for too long – to which these thirteen colonies listed twenty-seven grievances to illustrate a case for independence.

Note: In fairness and warning to the reader, these twenty-seven grievances have many redundant features, and share similar points – we’ve paraphrased them for quick reading here:

-The king refused to approve new laws meant for the necessary and wholesome public good.

-The king refused to allow for local law and legislative representation.

-The king set up legislative bodies too unusual, uncomfortable, and distant for the sole purpose of fatiguing the colonies into compliance.

-The king repeatedly dissolved any attempt to establish representation and continued to erode the rights of the colonies.

-The king interfered with processes which allowed local representation – leaving the colonies powerless, exposed and subject to danger.

-The king obstructed local efforts for naturalization, migrations and appropriations of new lands.

-The king obstructs the administration of justice and impedes local judiciary powers.

-The king made judges dependent on his will alone.

-The king created new offices and officers sent to harass the colonies, while requiring the locals to house and sustain the harasser’s existence.

-The king kept armies in the colonies without consent of the colonies.

-The king insisted his armies be independent and superior of local powers.

-The king joined forces with other powers to keep the colonies subject to his jurisdiction without legislation and subverting local powers or laws.

-The king required his armies to be housed among the locals.

-The king protected his troops from accusation, trial, or punishment for crimes committed in the colonies.  

-The king cut off the colonies’ trade with other parts of the world.

-The king imposed taxes without consent or representation.

-The king regularly deprived locals of fair trials by jury and insisted on trials in overseas locations for pretend offences.

-The king abolished local systems of law, replacing it with arbitrary government heads rendering the colonies victims of absolute foreign rule.

-The king removed local charters, critical local laws which altered the fundamentals of the colonies governance.

-The king suspended local legislatives declaring his law had power over all locals – he abdicated local governance.

-The king plundered local seas, ravaged the coasts, burnt out towns, and destroyed the lives of the locals in a war-like fashion.

-The king continued to send larger armies to cruelly enforce his tyranny and deceit unparalleled in known history.

-The king forced those taken captive to bear arms against the new nation.

-The king incited local insurrections and endeavored to bring indigenous inhabitants against the colonies.

Now, having listed the twenty-seven grievances, the declaration points out many efforts the colonies attempted to reach agreements with the king, only to be met with more injury and tyranny – the declaration further reminds the king of the many warning and attempts to legislate agreements, only to be met with deaf ears and bloodshed – so, the colonies had no other choice except to push back in most extreme measures.

Finally, the document crescendos with a written official declaration (from the newly formed United States of America) of independence from Great Britain – and that these colonies have rights, are free and independent – they are also absolved from allegiance to the crown and all political connections – they declared full power to wage war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and act in ways independent states act – these rights protected by divine providence – by this they pledge their lives, fortunes, and their sacred honor.

It was done – independence had been declared at great risk to all involved – there must have been inordinate amounts of fear, exuberance, and baited anticipation by all the signers right down to every citizen of the new nation – the road ahead would be balanced with risk and reward, both at great costs – a new nation was formed.

Its important to reflect on this portion of our history each Independence Day – because if we look closely, we can see where we maybe jeopardizing our own rights and freedoms (again) – that’s why its critical that we don’t lose sight of this history – even today, 248 years later, our nation finds herself tinkering with the same basics rights and freedoms this declaration proclaimed were divine providence.

Take care America – if we lean into positions and postures that restrict basic human rights and freedoms from some of us, they are no good for any of us – that is, unless we plan to declare independence from our independence for a narrower and more restricted America – sounds crazy, but there’s talk of it.

Again, take care America – Happy Independence Day!

**************

Below you will find actual text of the Declaration Of Independence – spelling and punctuation reflects the original document:

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Our Daughter

Each year your birthday is an enduring blessing to us.

Our daughter is an amazing woman, beautiful, positive, helpful, strong, resilient, and able to dig in a push forward even in the most difficult conditions.

Most people will never know the struggles and challenges life has peppered her path with – family and friends will never understand her ability to battle internal trials, getting lost in her own thoughts and still able to raise up and press through barriers that hold most of us all back.

We just see that she is always there – regularly rebounding and ready for the next thing (good or bad) – she’s strong and positive, even as we stand on the sideline unsure and confused – she has the gift of calm and assurance even if we’re unsure about our next step.

On the darkest of days, she can see beauty and value in others – balancing grace and shrewdness even if she feels her own reflection threatens her abilities.

The last few years we’ve learned many things – our perception of things has been altered – our daughter changed our world – from childhood, through many adversities, until this very moment she is constantly teaching us things about ourselves and life around us.

Through her eyes and in her pain, she has taught us through the determined way she carries herself as she pushes through trials and life’s unexpected difficulties – she regularly shows us tremendous courage.

She taught us that it’s okay to have bad days – we don’t have to pretend all is well – she believes in better days and good times are ahead for all of us – she believes there is strength and comfort in family, friends, and foundational beliefs – she’s shown us we can battle life’s perplexing problems and still get up and be strong each day.

We’re so proud of our daughter – she has come a long way from the little girl mustering up courage each time we moved her to a new community – she’s shown us that physical, relational, financial, emotional difficulties show up in all of our lives – but they don’t define who we are – we are defined by our character, our will to fight, and to get back up each day – that is true courage, and that is our daughter.

Happy Birthday Diana – you are such a blessing to us – we love you so much.

Moral Modification is NOT Gospel Transformation

Our pastor gave us a very good, very relevant subtext bullet two weeks ago – “moral modifications are not “gospel transformations.”

This resonated with me as churches struggle with clashing cultures, Christian Nationalism, and so called “woke agendas” – the application is simple:

A forced, legislated, or socially bullied moral modification compromises any effort to reach the world around us – because there is no gospel transformation associated with those efforts.

We are all called to “go” (Matthew 28) to the world near and far – we are also called to go in love (John 13) – going without that love, without a Christ-like posture, without a heart for world will only build barriers between us and those we’re called to reach.

POINT: We are NOT called to force, legislate, or socially bully the gospel to the world around us – we are called to go in love, care for, and serve the world around us, “so they may know who we are disciples of.”

We should take care that our desires for moral modifications don’t outweigh our efforts for gospel transformations – because in the end,  our fruits will always define and identify us.

Which Side Of Reality Are We On?

Consider the names of these famous people:

Comte de Saint-Germain

Baron Münchhausen

Alessandro di Cagliostro

Amy Bock

Gregor MacGregor

Mary Carleton

Charles Ponzi

Victor Lustig

Mithilesh Kumar Srivastava (Natwarlal)

Anna Sorokin

Sylvia Browne

George C. Parker

Alfredo Bowman (Dr Sebi)

Jim Jones

Barry Minkow

Jim & Tammy Bakker

Frank Abagnale

Marc Stuart Dreier

Steven Kunes

Steven Jay Russell

William Thompson

Donald Trump

Bernard Madoff

Elizabeth Holmes

Kevin Trudeau

Who are these people?

They are all people who have cheated or “conned” others, been found out, publicly faced legal/financial retribution, and became infamous for their suspect dealings with others – but most of all, these are con artists who continued to con others (or attempt to) even after being found out – there are easy to find, public transparent records of all their suspect achievements.

What exactly is a con artist? A swindler who exploits the confidence of the victim – exploited so much that victims encourage the con to play out – because they’re convinced the con is in their best interests – convinced beyond the point of any rational deduction – the victim eventually becomes a (oblivious) participant in the con.

Oddly, we have always been fascinated with con artists – many of us have been or could be drawn into a con – there is very little difference between us, and the countless numbers of well minded, educated, savvy, worldly people drawn into the cons of these people.  

There is one commonality among the victims – they all wanted the con to work so badly, that they refused to recognize any possible evidence of the con – evidence obvious to others who were not consumed by the con.

Something to think about for sure….

The Valentine in My Life

The Valentine in my life is so many things.

Not the things measured by media, what’s trending, or the world.

My Valentine is not loud, driven by inclinations, or the center of attention.

She is not calculating, aggressive, or motivated by self.

My Valentine is the pictures in our home, the places we’ve been, and the memories of our life.

The stories she reads to children, the laughter in her voice, and the light in her eyes.

She is a quiet presence, sprinkled with kindness and attention for others.

My Valentine is all the books, movies, art, and music she loves.

She is morning drowsiness, movie snuggles, and afternoon naps.

The smiles and tears she can’t help stirred by the strength of her beliefs.

My Valentine is friendships, family, and the values she lives.

She is all about comfort, quiet confidence, and  sweet companionship.

The life we’ve made, the future we pray for, and each day we’re together.

My Valentine is compassion, understanding, and forgiveness.

She is an intriguing glance, a warm touch, and a passionate embrace. 

My Valentine is made of so much beauty, strength, and love.

Happy Valentines Day Emily!

Working As Designed?

Who are the super wealthy?

How did they become super wealthy?

Do they cause good or harm to our economy?

No big surprise, the personal wealth of 5 of the richest people on the planet is growing exponentially.

Since 2020, their net worth skyrocketed by 114% for a total of $869 billion, according to a report from Oxfam’s annual inequality report, released in Jan 2024.

NOTE: that report is an easy google search away.

In no time at all, we could actually see the world’s first trillionaire – perhaps in less than a decade at the current rate of things.

I hate everything about this – for every billionaire who gets richer, the same data illustrates a negative affect on the world’s middle class and poorest people.

The Point: Nearly 5 billion people globally have become poorer contending with inflation, high interest rates, multiple wars, unemployment, and the world wide political chaos – the data shows it will take (not less than) 230 years to eliminate poverty based on our current trajectory.

NOTE: The report drew the data compiled by Forbes.

The report also argues that businesses are making some of the highest profits ever – which (oh by the way) seems to be only helping fuel the fortunes of the extremely wealthy.

Seven out of ten of the world’s largest public companies have either a billionaire CEO or a billionaire as its principal shareholder – this fact speaks to motive and method for increased
profits.

1% of the population holds 43% of the world’s financial assets, according to the same report.

148 of the world’s largest corporations made nearly $1.8 trillion in profits in the 12 months leading up to June 2023.

That’s 52.5% higher profits than their average was between 2018 to 2021 – the problem might not be just “inflation” – perhaps its also individual and corporate greed.

The same report calls out the oil and gas industry, pharmaceutical companies, insurance industry, goods and services, and the financial institutions for charging higher prices, which lead to higher profits in the last three years – higher than their averages in prior years.

Why does any of this matter? By its very nature the global economy is vulnerable – COVID19 hit the world economy hard which led to an even more unstable and vulnerable economy – so, did the rich take advantage of everything around them for their own personal benefit, at the expense of the middle class and the poor of the world?

Oddly, many inflation indicators have improved over the past 18 month, but not pricing – why not? The implications are pretty damning.

I’m not a fan of govt regulations to govern businesses – free enterprise and capitalism can be great – right?

What part of our economy governs the super wealthy?

Is our economy working as designed?

Without some correction or governance, what’s to curb unqualified high prices?

All good questions – next time, we’ll talk about what’s working (and not working) as industry, consumers, and the law step into this fray – I’ll wager you already know the answer.

More to follow…

There Is A Divide – Is it you?

We are such a hot mess – we’ve created our own multiple layers of crisis and conflict:

Israel vs Palestine

Right vs Left

Haves and Have Nots

East vs West

Public School vs Home School

Churched vs Unchurched

Fake News vs Real News

Russia vs Ukraine

Conservative vs Liberal

Christian vs Non-Christian

NATO vs Non-NATO

United Nations vs Non-United Nations

Capitalism vs Socialism

This list could go on for hours…

There is a divide – mankind has always been divided – this divide is not limited to nations or peoples – it is embedded deep within most political, economic, religious, governmental, judicial, and educational constructs.

One side of this divide are those who desire to know more, consider alternate ideas, and embrace change so the greater good can be served.

The other side of this divide are those with fixed ideas, refusing to consider thoughts outside of their hardened concepts, holding fast to notions that sustain beneficiaries of their fixed ideas.

This divide does not favor Left, or Right leaning agendas – both the Left, and the Right take turns at compromising the greater good for the sake of their respective self-serving agendas.

We intentionally let the divide grow deeper and wider even though…  to error is human – to be human is to be different – differences identify us, but should not divide us – but knowing this, we still lie to ourselves and those like us, insisting our differences MUST divide us.

I’ll never understand how we (most of us), knowing we’re all imperfect somehow think we’re entitled to grace, consideration, or latitude… but insist on all Hell raining down on those who do not share our identity or ideas – as if treating each other humanely is not possible just because of our differences.

Then to add insult to injury, we call for full-blown attacks on anyone who tries to heal or overcome the divide – we’ll even attack people on our own side of the divide just to keep likeminded members in-line with our identity and ideas.

This divide is not even about good or evil – just or unjust – righteous or unrighteous – it’s about pretending who we really are – we’ve become very clever and calculating with who we claim to be – we’ve learned to covertly compromise the good in us, while simultaneously candy coating the evils (also) in us.

The same is true with our political, economic, religious, governmental, judicial, and educational constructs – claiming to be good, just, and righteous, all while indulging our true selves with evil, unjust, and unrighteous fruits – then quietly washing our hands of humans in harm’s way, while ignoring our underlying responsibility for the same suffering.

It’s selfishness on steroids – it’s a “I, me, my mentality” ahead of anyone else receiving any version of equitable consideration – it’s indifference to suffering – it’s interference with opportunity and fairness – it’s a craving for power and control – it’s fear of losing our safe and secure home-sanctuaries – it’s a deaf ear, and a blind eye to oppression as long as the return favors our cause.

Yes, there is a divide, and it reeks with the high-cost human suffering and oppression – this divide will continue to grow deeper and wider unless we intentionally step up, speak out, stand firm deliberately insisting on change – our voice and our vote are not enough – it will take our unwavering, visible, undeniable actions at every level of our environment’s constructs for positive transparent change.

NOTE: Being indifferent to the divide has the same impact as embracing the divide – don’t be indifferent.

“We Don’t Have to Have Enemies”

To understand and untangle the thousands of years of Israeli – Palestinian conflict, one would have to take a wider view of mankind, religions, and selfish motives.

The world is populated by 7.9 billion people of many races, cultures, nations, and religions – the planet has enough land, resources, and learned technology to house, care for, and allow balanced bordered regions for all its people – it’s simply a question of whether or not we’ll implement our capabilities, or will we continue tolerating disparities between liberated and oppressed people groups – it’s important to note, these disparities are the result of decisions we all made, and conditions we allow.

Consider this point about religions (it is a religious conflict) – if the top ten dominant religions of the world believed, acted on, and obediently carried out their beliefs, the question of liberated or oppressed peoples would no longer need addressing – I’m not naive, there are natural conflicts between people groups – but in most cases throughout history there are always aggressors and oppressors acting on motives that conflict with their respective religious teachings – the religious teachings are seldom the problem – being obedient to those teachings is the larger problem.

These conflicts typically arise when land, resources or leaned technology are disputed – these disputes typically generate liberated and oppressed conditions for some of the impacted people groups – instead of a equitable neutral application of the resource in conflict, the dominate group defiantly steps away from their religious beliefs to create a legacy of haves and the have nots – followed closely by the dominate group proclaiming some fabricated justification to candy coat their aggression (i.e. Manifest Destiny, Colonialism, and the like).  

Furthermore in conflict with the basics of most religious beliefs, dominant religious groups claimed “spiritual motivation” and set out to “enforce” their beliefs on other people groups in the name of their preferred God (The Inquisition, The Crusades, and hundreds of similar efforts across Eastern and Western cultures) – this further separated liberated and oppressed peoples, and caused hundreds of generations of religious division all over the world – again, peoples stepping away from their beliefs in order to oppress other people groups for selfish motives.  

In the early 1500’s, the theologian Martin Luther sought to answer similar questions with the publication of his Ninety-Five Theses: Basically, who are the true Christians, and what is the true Church? His writings were responsible for breaking up the Catholic Church (religious powerhouse of the day) and sparking the Protestant Reformation which led to the array of Chrisitian beliefs we have today – Luther was motivated by many disparities in the church, not the least of which was the condition of peasants, the working class poor, and the oppressed – one of many points he recognized was that religion should not cause or tolerate conditions that unjustly lead to the lack of basic human needs and survival.  

Luther was just one of hundreds of activists across history that brought attention to common trends which caused liberated and oppressed people groups, and selfish motives – which brings us back to the Israeli – Palestinian conflict – now that we’ve reminded ourselves of thousands of years of aggressors, oppressors, and selfish motives we can easily see how motivations like the following became more normal:

In 1937 Winston Churchill said of the Palestinians; “I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger, even though he may have lived there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America, or the Black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly-wise race, to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.”

Mr Churchill is not a loan extremist with these dehumanizing opinions – in spite of his paralleled statesmanship and global influence, this man’s crime against humanity strongly diminishes his accomplishments –  there are hundreds of millions of people and people groups that support views of this nature with an intent to oppress another peoples – these extremist are all over the world in positions of national leadership, religious influence, impactors of business and industry, and purveyors of news and information – due to this fact, there will never be peace between Israel and Palestinian as long as these horrifying beliefs exist – these beliefs cause the divisive condition of liberation verses oppression – both Israel and Palestinian must be liberated in order for peace to have a chance.

The civil rights activist Kwame Ture reminded us in 1968; “There is a difference between peace and liberation. You can have injustice and also have peace. “You can have peace and be enslaved. So, peace is not the answer – liberation is the answer.”

What’s his point? Peace is a false objective – liberation is a more constructive objective so peace can be the byproduct of liberation.

Now, this is not to say that terrorist groups cannot be effectively dealt with – to this point, targeting a terrorist group does not mean punishing a people group for the crimes of the terrorist – the powers of the world have failed this simple application of justice time and time again – liberation is only possible if our global society justly distributes land, resources and learned technology across all its people groups.

We don’t have to have enemies – however it appears (in many cases) we’re electing to have enemies – perhaps we could make better choices.